Eesti Eest! Newspaper delivers curated news that cut through the censorship, mainstream bias, and institutional dominance that has left society divided and misinformed. The platform allows readers to access the news that matters, particularly when it is being ignored. Updated minute-by-minute with news coverage from a diversity of publications and topics. The website may display, include, or make available third-party content (including data, information, applications, and other products, services, and/or materials) or provide links to third-party websites or services, including through third-party advertising (“Third-Party Materials”). You acknowledge and agree that Eesti Eest! is not responsible for Third-Party Materials, including their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, copyright compliance, legality, decency, quality, or any other aspect thereof. Eesti Eest does not assume and will not have any liability or responsibility to you or any other person or entity for any Third-Party Materials. Third-Party Materials and links thereto are provided solely as a convenience to you, and you access and use them entirely at your own risk and subject to such third parties’ terms and conditions. This Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule. Any legal suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be instituted exclusively in the federal courts of the United States or the courts of the State of Delaware. You waive any and all objections to the exercise of jurisdiction over you by such courts and to venue in such courts. The Content and Services are based in the state of Delaware in the United States and provided for access and use only by persons located in the United States. You acknowledge that you may not be able to access all or some of the Content and Services outside of the United States and that access thereto may not be legal by certain persons or in certain countries. If you access the Content and Services from outside the United States, you are responsible for compliance with local laws. All information on this site is intended for entertainment purposes only.
Contact us: [email protected]
Eesti Eest!
Lawyers for Moderna have appeared before the Coroners Court of Victoria for a hearing into the death of Natalie Boyce, a 21-year-old law and commerce student who died from myocarditis after taking the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
The Coroners Court is currently investigating whether Ms. Boyce’s death was caused by the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
On April 17, the court was told that Ms. Boyce received her third vaccine, which was the Moderna vaccine, on Feb. 18, 2022.
Around one week later, she went to a general practitioner (GP) after experiencing vomiting for five days, along with aching pain and fainting at one point.
In the ensuing weeks, Ms. Boyce went to a hospital and a medical centre as her symptoms persisted.
Then, on March 5, she attended Mulgrave Private Hospital after suffering from chest pain and shortness of breath. She was then transferred to The Alfred, where she was diagnosed with fulminant myocarditis, a severe cardiac inflammation disease that is often fatal.
Ms. Boyce’s condition deteriorated after undergoing surgery to remove a blood clot. She later suffered a heart attack during an MRI.
What the Autopsy Report Revealed
A post-mortem on Ms. Boyce found that she died from an acute myocarditis infarction.
“[G]iven the close proximity in time due to vaccine, a vaccine-related myocarditis cannot be excluded,” the autopsy report said.
However, the report also said that acute myocarditis infarction could not be diagnosed post-mortem.
Meanwhile, Moderna’s cardiologist submitted a letter to the court saying that “the conclusion from the autopsy report should be accepted: that a definitive cause for Ms. Boyce’s myocarditis cannot be identified.”
This was in reference to the report by Moderna’s cardiologist, whose findings have differed from other medical evidence presented to the coroner, counsel assisting Jessika Syrjanen said.
However, Ms. Syrjanen did not detail how Moderna’s report differed from the other medical evidence concerning Ms. Boyce’s cause of death and medical management.
“I seek clarification from Moderna’s legal representatives today as to Moderna’s current position and whether that has changed,” Ms. Syrjanen said.
In response, Moderna’s lawyer, Jesse Rudd, said she could not provide instant clarification on the company’s position and has sought time to seek advice.
In February, Moderna engaged its own cardiologist to provide an expert opinion to the court, and asked for extended leave to provide a report from them.
All parties have been given eight weeks to read through Moderna’s report and consider their positions.
The case will return to court on July 17.